Bog Roll ::

It's Not Magic, It's Work!

16 Sep 2015

Vanity Sizing

Owing to a reduction in my body mass I've been forced to buy new clothing. It's been an expensive process and annoying to replace otherwise perfectly usable clothes...

I happened to have some older clothes that were not used much as they had previously been a little on the small size. The good news is that I've been able to wear them more regularly so I've avoided buying a few things!

One thing does annoy me. Unlike women's clothing which uses strange numbers, most men's clothing using simple actual measurements, waist of x inches / y centimetres. It's a fairly straight forward system, you know how big your waist size etc and should should be able to buy off-the-peg clothing without too much of a worry. However it's not true anymore! My older clothes when measured with a tape are the size that the label says. The modern ones vary wildly - though they all seem to be much larger than the label says. For example:

  • 20 year old pairs of M&S St. Michael Jeans, says 34", are 34"
  • 20 year old pairs of BHS chinos, says 34", are 34"
  • Modern M&S relaxed fit chinos, says 36", at least 38" more as they age
  • Modern Craghoppers Kiwi walking trousers, says 30", more like 33"

Some clothes, like jeans and those with elasticated bits do get larger with wear and washing, but even so modern clothes seem to be at least once size (2"/5 cm) larger than the label says they should be. Older clothing from the same company is the size it says...

At the moemnt I'm about a real size of 33"/84 cm waist, which is a pain as British men's trousers don't come in odd sizes, so it's either a real size of 32" (tight) or 34" (loose), but in vanity sizing that could be anything from 30"...